What happened on 9/11?

Only the small secrets need to be protected.

The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity.

- Pao Tongson

Where did the Towers go?

At approximately 4:06 pm on 9/11 ABC's Peter Jennings

featured a News Exclusive with Kevin Sutabee

who had shot video of ground zero an hour earlier.

At the end of the clip we see the facade of the lobby

of the South Tower still standing.

It is taller than the surrounding debris.

How can a 110 story building collapse 'into its own footprint'

and leave the facade of its lobby still standing?

ambulance-WTC-1

WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?

by JUDY WOOD, B.S., M.S., PhD. p.114

The ambulance, parked at street level,

is a visual gage to determine the small amount

of debris. We also see part of the lower wall of WTC 1 -

the North Tower - still standing.

WHERE...p.182

Firefighter, Captain Jay Jonas, one of 14 firefighters

trapped in stairwell B of the north tower.

I know exactly where ground zero was.

It was the B stairway of the north tower,

thats exactly Ground Zero.

Thats the geographic centre of that building.

And I was in the middle of that.

...a beam of sunshine hit the stairway.

I looked and said,

"Guys, there used to be 106 floors above us

and now I'm seeing sunshine."
They're like "What?"

I said "There's nothing above us.

That building doesn't exist."

...So I make my way up to the hole.

I poke my head out and I couldn't believe what I saw.

I couldn't believe it.

The first thing I saw

was that corner facade that was still standing.

And I was looking at it.

I said, "I can't believe this.

This is unbelievable."

NTS-2

WHERE...p.183

Where did WTC 4 go?

WHERE...p.188

WHERE...p.186

WTC-6

WHERE...p.20

The destruction of WTCs 4 and 6 is not mentioned

in the many 'alternative' discussions of the events of 9/11.

The destruction could not be caused

by a collapse nor from falling debris.

Could it be that the destruction of WTCs 4 and 6

does not 'fit' the "controlled demolition" narrative?

Emergency Medical Technician Michael Ober does not understand

why he cannot remember the sound of a building hitting the ground.

"I don't remember the sound of the building hitting the ground.

somebody told me that it was measured on the Richter scale,

I don't know how true that is.

If the building is hitting the ground that hard,

how do I not remember the sound of it?"

This is a significant statement. Each of the WTC towers was 500,000 tons,

or the equivalent of 50,000 full ten-ton dump trucks.

If 50,000 full dump trucks crashed to the ground,

some dropping from over 1/4 mile above the earth,

certainly there would be a very loud crashing sound

that would shake the ground.

WHERE...p.71

When the National Construction Safety Team (NCST)

Advisory Committee met via teleconference on

Thursday, December 14, 2006, from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.,

the following statement, as we have seen, was made by Dr. Shyam Sunder

about the WTC1 and WTC2 seismic signals:

"The signals' strength due to the collapse

of the towers were not of any magnitude

that was seismically significant from an earthquake

design standpoint or from the design or a failure

of a structural component or I would say of

a piping system that might be used in a structure,

so ah there wasn't anything that gave us pause

in terms of that being a significant seismic event

to have ruptured the pipeline."

That is, as part of the official investigation of WTC7,

it was determined that pipelines passing under the WTC complex

and entering WTC7 would not have been ruptured

because the "collapse" of WTC1 and WTC2

were not significant seismic events.

That is, two 500,000-ton buildings,

each over a quarter mile tall,

slammed to the ground and yet did not cause

a significant seismic event that would

damage the pipelines under the WTC complex.

But then an overwhelmingly important question occurs:

Why would the destruction stop at ground level?

WHERE...P.63

The concourse/mall area directly under the WTC:

The parking/delivery level - one level below the concourse/mall.

Ask Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth:

How stairwell B in the geographic centre

of WTC 1 is not buried under the debris

of 106 floors of office building.

How the facades of the lobbies

of WTC's 1 and 2 are still standing

and not under 110 stories of debris

from 'collapsed' buildings.

How the main part of WTC 4 could disappear.

How the hole in WTC 6 is the result of

the controlled demolition of WTC 1.

Or how the lower wall of WTC 1

could still be standing.

And finally...

why the destruction stopped at ground level.

The Pentagon was hit by a missile.

Pentagon eye witness,

Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret),

was working in the Pentagon on 9/11

in her capacity as Political-Military Affairs Officer

in the Office of the Secretary of Defence

when American Airlines flight 77

allegedly hit the Pentagon.

Lt. Col. Kwiatkowski stated:

The facade had a rather small hole,

no larger than 20 feet in diameter.

Although this facade later collapsed,

it remained standing for 30 or 40 minutes,

with the roof line remaining relatively straight.

The scene, in short,

was not what I would have expected

from a strike by a large jetliner.

It was, however, exactly

what one would expect

if a missile had struck the Pentagon.

CNN broadcast segment beginning at 5:08 pm,

@ 6:15 reporter Jamie McIntyre's earlier interview,

with USA Today Live

reporter, Mike Walter, was broadcast.

Walter described the Pentagon impact:

It was like a cruise missile with wings

went right there

and slammed right into the Pentagon.

huge explosion

great ball of fire

smoke started billowing out

At approximately 7:57 into the segment, Walter states,

I got out and walked over

and I saw parts of the plane,

the debris was actually on the overpass there.

the debris, is at the point of impact.

Walter's description,

parts of the plane, the debris...on the overpass

is in contradiction to his statement,

and slammed right into the Pentagon.

Either Walter witnessed an impact of the Pentagon,

or a crash on the overpass.

An impact of the Pentagon leaving debris on the overpass,

as Walter states,

violates the laws of physics.

Walter's report is ficticious.

Fox News broadcast segment beginning at 4:09 pm,

@ 29:40 Aziz El Hallan,

a Pentagon "eyewitness," is interviewed.

The interviewer states that El Hallan

was driving to work with his girlfriend.

Jus around 9:08 - 9:15

jus hitting the 110 South actually North.

The time of the impact of the Pentagon

9:37-9:38

means El Hallen is at the Pentagon,

20+ minutes prior to the alleged impact.

El Hallen, describes the alleged impact of the Pentagon:

Kind of the Pentagon sucked in the airplane

so we didn't see anymore parts

or any pieces of the airplane.

El Hallan's description violates the laws of physics.

A building cannot, suck in, an airliner

leaving no, part or pieces of the airplane,

at the point of impact.

El Hallan stated that the alleged plane was

probably flying around 60 to 70 yards

on top of my car.

At the end of the clip El Hallan alleges

to have a piece of the 'airplane.'

Meaning the alleged plane began to breakup

while still flying 60 to 70 yards in the air.

El Hallen's report is ficticious.

Maj General Albert Stubblebine,

Two Star General US Army (RET),

an expert on image analysis.

Stubblebine states:

The plane does not fit in that hole.

So what DID hit the Pentagon? What hit it?

The Pentagon was not hit by an airliner.

In 2006 FoxNews interviewed Professor Morgan Reynolds,

professor emeritus at Texas A&M University,

chief economist for the US Labor Department on 9/11.

Profesor Reynolds states:

The two American Airlines flights

for example, though, were not even in

the Bureau of Transportation Statistics database.

Not in the Bureau of Transportation Statistics database

means that no flight plans were filed.

American Airlines flights 11 and 77

did not fly on September 11, 2001.

There is no evidence at the scene of the alleged impact

to substantiate the claim that

the Pentagon was hit by an airliner.

There is evidence to substantiate the claim

that the Pentagon was hit by a missile.

Evidence of direct media involvement

in the 9/11 conspiracy,

is presented at 9bloop.com

'Who' fired the missile at the Pentagon?

Would 'Arab terrorists'

have the ability

to fire a cruise missile

at the Pentagon?

No.

An article published in the, Santa Fe Mexican,

July 7, 1996, titled, Germany's Top Guns,

is evidence of fighter/bombers belonging to a foreign state,

licenced to carry hot weapons,

stationed in the US.

The article states:

The Tornados, the pilots, the ground crew

they're all a part of the first and only

foreign military base on U.S. soil

the facility will become the Luftwaffe's

'top gun' training center

where their best pilots train other pilots

rotating through the base from German air bases.

At Holloman, German pilots have the opportunity

to fly low-level missions using live weapons.

"Using these weapons is something

we really cannot do in Europe," Sowada said.

There are too few ranges where you can

employ hot weapons.

Sowada dismissed rumours that the Luffwaffe

is part of a conspiracy

to invade the United States as 'ridiculous'

and the result of the media's need to liven up

the typically slow news days of the summer

with controversy. (emphasis added)

Evidence that a very fast, low level military plane,

was monitored on radar

heading in the direction of Washington

moments before the alleged missile impact on the Pentagon

is given by two air traffic controllers.

The speed,

the maneuverability,

the way that he turned,

we all thought in the radar room,

all of us experienced air traffic controllers,

that that was a military plane, said O'Brien.

You don't fly a 757 in that manner. It's unsafe

This must be a fighter.

This must be one of our guys sent in,

scrambled to patrol our capital,

and to protect our president,

and we sat back in our chairs and breathed

for just a second.

We lost radar contact with that aircraft.

And we waited. And we waited.

And your heart is just beating out of your chest

waiting to hear what's happened.

And then

the Washington National Airport controllers

came over our speakers in our room and said,

"Dulles, hold all of our inbound traffic.

The Pentagon's been hit."

Danielle O'Brien - Air Traffic Controller,

Dulles Tower, Washington, D.C. On duty the morning of 9/11/01.

Dateline NBC Interview 9/11/02:

Todd Lewis: One of my colleagues,

saw a primary target

moving quite fast from northwest to the southeast.

So, we all started watching that target,

and she notified the supervisor.

But nobody knew

that was a commercial flight at the time.

Nobody knew that was American 77.

Tom Brokaw: What did you think,

it was a military flight of some kind.

Todd Lewis: I thought it was a military flight.

I thought that Langley had scrambled some fighters

and maybe one of them got up there.

Tom Brokaw: It was really moving fast.

Todd Lewis: It was moving very fast,

like a military aircraft might move at a low altitude.

Todd Lewis - Air Traffic Controller,

Dulles Tower, Washington, D.C. On duty the morning of 9/11/01.

Lewis' comment, Nobody knew that was American 77.

given a year after 9/11,

does not come from authentic documents,

as evidenced by Professor Morgan Renyolds

on the FoxNews clip presented above,

it comes from exposure to media sources.

The Luftwaffe is within US territory,

is licenced to carry hot weapons,

the pilot trainers were an exclusive core of the best;

does not prove that the missile which hit the Pentagon

was fired by the Luftwaffe stationed in New Mexico.

It does, however, give conclusive evidence of the

ABILITY

of the Luftwaffe

to launch the missile attack on the Pentagon

from within US territory.

On ABC's News segment beginning at 3:28 pm

host Peter Jennings,

interrupts reporter, George Stehpanopoulos,

to receive a call from reporter, Ann Compton,

who we are informed, has been travelling

with the President aboard Air Force One.

Compton states they have just landed

at Offut Air Force Base,

home of Strategic Command,

and that the President has gone down the rabbit hole

to a secure bunker

where he will chair

a national security council meeting

by teleconference.

At approximately 1:13 the video image

is replaced with a map of Nebraska.

The symbol identifying Offutt Air Force Base,

is a blue and silver Iron Cross.

Map_Nebraska

Why would Offut Air Force Base be signified

with the symbol of the modern German military?

When Jennings returns to Stehpanopoulos

he refers to his time in the White House

during the Clinton Administration -

at which time both the Oklahoma City bombing

and TWA flight 800 downing occurred.

At approximately 9:00 minutes into the segment,

Jennings asks,

From a purely operation point of view

would you like to be in the White House

or a bunker in Nebraska?

Or would it make any difference?

Stephanopoulos replies,

I think right now Peter

it doesn't make any difference.

Airforce One and this bunker in Nebraska

has complete communications

all across the board.

On ABC's broadcast segment beginning at 4:09 pm

@ 13:36 Jennings says,